mitmproxy/doc-src/dev/testing.html
2014-01-27 14:16:23 +13:00

44 lines
1.7 KiB
HTML

All the mitmproxy projects strive to maintain 100% code coverage. In general,
patches and pull requests will be declined unless they're accompanied by a
suitable extension to the test suite.
Our tests are written for the [nose](https://nose.readthedocs.org/en/latest/).
At the point where you send your pull request, a command like this:
<pre class="terminal">
> nosetests --with-cov --cov-report term-missing ./test
</pre>
Should give output something like this:
<pre class="terminal">
> ---------- coverage: platform darwin, python 2.7.2-final-0 --
> Name Stmts Miss Cover Missing
> ----------------------------------------------------
> libmproxy/__init__ 0 0 100%
> libmproxy/app 4 0 100%
> libmproxy/cmdline 100 0 100%
> libmproxy/controller 69 0 100%
> libmproxy/dump 150 0 100%
> libmproxy/encoding 39 0 100%
> libmproxy/filt 201 0 100%
> libmproxy/flow 891 0 100%
> libmproxy/proxy 427 0 100%
> libmproxy/script 27 0 100%
> libmproxy/utils 133 0 100%
> libmproxy/version 4 0 100%
> ----------------------------------------------------
> TOTAL 2045 0 100%
> ----------------------------------------------------
> Ran 251 tests in 11.864s
</pre>
There are exceptions to the coverage requirement - for instance, much of the
console interface code can't sensibly be unit tested. These portions are
excluded from coverage analysis either in the **.coveragerc** file, or using
**#pragma no-cover** directives. To keep our coverage analysis relevant, we use
these measures as sparingly as possible.